Tuesday, 14 June 2011

Accellion Q2 Customer Conference

We just wrapped up our second Accellion Customer Conference of 2011, and it was great to experience the energy of our customers. We had a large number of attendees and engaging questions regarding our current and future product portfolio.
During yesterday’s session, the Accellion team took the opportunity to deliver Secure Collaboration tips and tricks, show a demo of our Mobile Apps, and provide updates on how customers can upgrade to the latest solutions.
For those customers who attended, and took the opportunity to engage with the Accellion team, we want to thank you. For customers who missed it, you can visit the Accellion Forum to listen to a recording of the session.
If you are interested in learning more about our Secure Collaboration solution with Mobile Apps, please contact our sales team. We’d love to share with you how Accellion can help your organization securely collaborate with colleagues, vendors, partners, and customers.
We look forward to seeing you at the next conference.

by Nina Seth

Bouncer to be first whitelisting platform to achieve Common Criteria Evaluation Assurance Level 3+

I’m very proud to announce that the CoreTrace Bouncer application whitelisting solution is in the testing process to be certified to Common Criteria Evaluation Assurance Level (EAL) 3+. As we go through evaluation under the Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme (CCS), I’m completely confident that our platform will become the first application whitelisting solution to be certified to Common Criteria EAL 3+.
As a former Air Force Information Warfare Officer, I know the dangers today’s threat landscape poses to our critical infrastructure, government and military systems. The impact of more sophisticated, targeted attacks like the Stuxnet worm are intended to create damage well beyond financial losses; they pose a significant threat to public safety and our national security. As I continue to come across stories like, “Protecting Utilities from Imminent Threats,” and “Researcher blasts Siemens for downplaying SCADA threat,” I’m constantly reminded of the need for rigorous, independently validated solutions like Bouncer.
The Common Criteria certifications reflect extensive evaluations of the security features and capabilities of information technology and networking products in clearly specific, real-world operating environments. Considered a prerequisite in many government procurements in the U.S. and abroad, the certification process provides independent verification of the developer’s security test results, and evaluates the developer’s checks for vulnerabilities, the development environmental controls and the product’s configuration management.
Going through a more rigorous EAL 3+ testing, which is more extensive and methodical than EAL 2 certifications, provides an additional level of confidence and assurance that our customers need and deserve for protecting their critical systems and networks.
Our commitment to delivering solutions that meet or exceed the national security criteria set by the National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP) is why we are pursuing Common Criteria Level 3+ Evaluation. Achieving EAL 3+ status will be yet another way we are proving the security worthiness of application control and whitelisting to protect critical systems and networks from more dangerous cyber attacks.

by Toney Jennings

Modern, *proactive* security suites: What are the “must have” components?

I know this will come as a shock to all security experts, but our systems and networks are constantly under attack by an ever-expanding list of malware that threatens just about everything we do online — from working and shopping to communicating and governing. It’s true that hackers never sleep, which means that every corner presents a potential danger each time we go online. If we aren’t adequately prepared to protect the systems we rely on and get ahead of more harmful, targeted attacks, we will continue to fall victim to evolving cyber crimes that are out to exploit our systems to steal sensitive and proprietary information for personal gain, corporate espionage or international deception. We need to move to a modern, proactive security suite.
According to the article, “Time for America to Get Cyber-Serious,” today’s cyber crimes go beyond draining personal bank accounts, but pose a threat to the freedoms, prosperity and security of all Americans. While the Department of Defense sees cyber attacks as a growing threat to the 3.5 million commercial computer systems they depend on to conduct military operations and protect our national security, online threats are a growing problem that’s not just limited to the public sector. Like the DoD, organizations everywhere are susceptible to malware attacks that target specific systems.
With government and private information networks increasingly under attack, a trend recognized in 2001 by the Government Accountability Office continues to hold up a decade later; the biggest difference is today’s online threats are more severe and potentially more dangerous than ever before.
Daily, DOD identifies and records thousands of “cyber events,” some of which are determined to be attacks against systems and networks. These attacks may be perpetrated by individuals inside or outside the organization, including hackers, foreign-sponsored entities, employees, former employees, and contractors or other service providers.
As the bad guys continue to come up with new ways to compromise our systems and network security, one of the ways we can get ahead of these evolving threats is to implement proactive solutions that stop the onslaught of new viruses and malware variants. Application whitelisting is one such solution that stops unapproved applications (like malware payloads) or memory attacks from running on a system, without requiring any advanced information about malicious threats.
You would expect an application whitelisting supplier to suggest the technology as a part of the new proactive defense arsenal– but what are the other ones? I would love to hear your opinions on the subject. What are the “must have” components that make up a modern, proactive security suite?
So, is it time to get “cyber-serious”? You bet it is. With new threats on the horizon, both the public and private sectors need to shed their dependencies on reactive solutions that cannot stop modern attacks. If we expect to stop the threats of tomorrow, we need to become proactive and make network endpoint security a priority today.

by JT Keating

Aberdeen Wireless LAN Report Tracks Impact of Smart Devices

A special Aberdeen Group report titled, “Wireless LAN 2011: Readying the Invisible Network for the Smart Revolution is the first industry study to track the impact of the rapid rise of smart devices on the WLAN.
The proliferation of embedded WiFi devices – smartphones, tablets, and Machine-to-Machine sensors (M2M) – and the explosion of wireless activity in and around the enterprise make maintaining a good security posture and meeting regulatory compliance requirements more challenging than ever.
According to Andrew Borg, senior research analyst, Wireless & Mobility for Aberdeen, and the report’s author, “A network is suboptimal unless network performance and security are both addressed. It isn’t enterprise class if it isn’t secure. As a consequence top-performing organizations are consistent in considering network security a high priority.”
This report is available immediately at no cost, courtesy of AirTight Networks.
 
by Mike Baglietto

Friday, 20 May 2011

How social engineering threats jump from end-users to corporate networks… and what can stop them

Just when browsers have become more secure from cybercrime, hackers are turning their attentions to the people using them. According to the article, “Microsoft: One in 14 downloads is malicious,” social engineering attacks have blossomed into one of the most preferred criminal tactics to get users to download harmful Trojans. With the rate of about 1 in every 14 programs downloaded by Windows users being some type of malware, Alex Stamos, a founding partner with security consulting firm, Isec Partners, said if attackers can’t get passed tougher browser defenses, they’re adopting new tricks that prey on peoples’ poor decision making.

Today, there are a number of different social engineering techniques that cyber criminals are using to deliver malware to end users, including:

  • Email from a friend: Users get a message from a friend telling them to view a video. When the link asks to download some required software, they are actually downloading a malicious program.



  • Spam: Hackers are using unsolicited email spam to send Trojan horses to individuals, hoping to dupe people into downloading fake advertisements that deliver malicious code onto their machines.


  • Spearphishing: Criminals create a maliciously encoded document that the victim is likely to open such as a follow up from a recent conference or a planning document from a partner organization.


  • Fake AV warnings: Criminals are hacking into Web pages and popping up fake antivirus warnings designed to look like messages from the operating system. Downloading these will infect a machine.


  • Malicious websites: Hackers trick search engines into linking to malicious websites that look like they have interesting stories or video about the hottest news topics.

  • While these threats can be perceived as consumer-related issues, businesses only need to look at this information in regards to “their employees” to understand how social engineering attacks can jump from end-users to corporate networks. The fact is, if an employee is tricked into downloading malware, the infected machine that is connected to a network can put corporate data and systems at risk.

    The truth is, we will never be able to control our employees’ online behavior. Nor, is it realistic to train or re-train every employee perfectly. Because of this, the key to preventing malware attacks is to stop the payload from getting on the network. Application whitelisting does this by preventing the execution of any unauthorized application from running on a machine, no matter how the malware is delivered.

    By: JT Keating

    Wednesday, 11 May 2011

    Cloud security: Protecting critical data is job #1…

    Cloud computing has certainly taken its share of hits lately. Last month’s Amazon outage created a lot of chatter and analysis around the reliability and availability of cloud-based services. Despite what pretty much amounts to growing pains for cloud computing, most everyone agrees that businesses will continue pursuing cloud services for the many cost and competitive advantages that the cloud promises.

    The one thing that these types of events bring to light is the importance of security with cloud providers. According to the recent article, “Symantec executives caution customers on cloud provider security,” as more and more businesses turn to cloud services, they need to hold their providers to the same security standards that they adhere to because they can still be liable if their data is breached.

    Whether an organization’s business assets are on-premise or reside in the cloud, securing critical data needs to be the No. 1 priority. The top challenge is finding an anti-malware solution that protects data without compromising the productivity of their systems. Unfortunately, using traditional antivirus products alone is not the answer. For many companies that continue to rely on antivirus solutions to protect their networks, the challenge remains because of two significant factors.

    First, antivirus can’t keep up with the tens of thousands of new malicious software that surfaces every day. With about 55,000 new viruses popping up daily, catching all the “known” malware coming through is impossible with reactive antivirus products. Second, as blacklist-based solutions try to keep up, the constant scanning for threats and downloading signature updates are eroding the overall performance of their systems.

    As a result, organizations need a solution that provides maximum endpoint security without reducing system performance. Bouncer by CoreTrace does both. Using application whitelisting technology that doesn’t require file and system scanning or frequent signature updates, Bouncer stops the execution of any unauthorized applications without slowing down the system–in physical or virtual environments. Don’t just take my word for it, check out the Citrix Security Challenge page where the short video, “Maximizing Security & Performance of Citrix XenDesktops with CoreTrace Bouncer” received the most community votes. Even in the cloud, you can have security and performance at the same time.

    By: JT Keating

    Monday, 2 May 2011

    Let’s make systems more secure, rather than blacklisting more efficient…

    For the sake of argument, let’s say an anti-malware strategy combining cloud-based malware identification and information sharing capabilities could eliminate the bulk of malware. Even in a perfect world with perfect collaboration, such an approach will fall short of protecting enterprise systems against more sophisticated cyber attacks if it relies heavily on reactive blacklisting technology.

    In the article, “IT security industry collaboration could eliminate 90% of malware,” Eugene Kaspersky, co-founder and chief executive of Kaspersky Lab, recently told attendees at Infosecurity Europe 2011 that identifying malware faster would reduce the number of initial infections to the point that it would break the business model of most cyber criminals.
    “The number of initial infections will be so low that it will cost cybercriminals more to develop the malware than they are able to recoup.”
    In all due respect to Mr. Kaspersky, there are two things that we take exception to in this article.


    First, even in the best possible scenario where all the crowd-sourcing came together perfectly, you’re stopping 90% of nuisance, known malware. This kind of reactive approach is no solution for protecting our systems from the truly advanced, sophisticated targeted threats that are becoming the norm today.

    Second, Mr. Kaspersky mentions whitelisting, but he uses the term inaccurately–in the same way most incumbent blacklisting providers do. True application whitelisting solutions enforce a whitelist of approved applications, thereby preventing the execution of all other applications (including zero day malware, etc.). Incumbant blacklisting providers like Mr. Kaspersky, in an attempt to protect their revenue streams and compete against other blacklisting solutions, have bastardized the term whitelisting as a way to make blacklist scans more efficient. They are mangling the term to describe a process wherein the performance impact of blacklist scans are reduced because “whitelisted” (“known good”) files do not need to be included in blacklist scans. This does not make endpoints more secure, it makes blacklisting more efficient.

    Instead of relying on reactive approaches to stop the vast majority of nuisance malware, application whitelisting solutions proactively prevent all unapproved code from running on a system–including new or unknown malware that remains under the radar of reactive, information sharing approaches.

    By: JT Keating